|
Post by horseguy on Oct 6, 2016 15:11:48 GMT
At the bakery where I work there are soap and paper towel automatic dispensers by the hand washing sink. I rarely encounter these photo electric sensing dispensers but now they are my new norm, except at home. The other day I was in a public restroom and stuck my hand out under the soap dispenser and nothing came out. Turns out it was the old type where you had to push up with the palm of your hand to get soap out of it. In that moment I realized that the automatic dispensers at the bakery had changed my behavior, my expectation and to a degree my consciousness.
The first horse I rode as a child for many years was a Thoroughbred. That horse pretty much made me the rider I am. That small gelding set my baseline expectation of equine movement and a lot more. That movement is my reference point. It's how I measure other horses. That gelding was very sure footed, handy and quick, and very well trained. Military riders in the 20th century rode quick, agile horses. The role of cavalry had evolved to reconnaissance and some raiding missions to test the enemy. The horses reflected the mission. Prior to that cavalry was employed on a slower moving battlefield to break enemy infantry lines, to flank and to pursue retreating infantry. Weapons were heavier and degrees of armor were still used even in the later 19th century. Those missions required bigger heavier horses, Warmblood types.
Today the Warmbloods have made a comeback, not only in dressage but in several other equestrian sports. Like the new automatic soap dispensers, these horses are setting different expectations and reference points for many of today's riders. To me riding a Warmblood feels like my dad's 1956 Buick Roadmaster.
This Buick is exactly like his. His friends would ask him why he bought a pink car and he would say assertively, "It's not pink, it's coral."
I can't imagine having a Warmblood as my baseline or reference point for horse movement. I suspect that the riders who do feel very "jittery" on a small quick and handy horse. And what about the standing still to top speed in four strides take-your-breath-away movement? One of my favorites from a good polo mare. That must scare the c**p out of a rider who has the Warmblood lumbering feel as their standard.
Here's my question. Which is better? I don't mean better movement because they are just different. My question is which movement makes a better baseline? Of course, I am going to say the handy quick horse because that's my reference point, but I will justify it by asking which is easier to go from to the other? Objectively, do you think that a rider who started riding on a handy horse has an easier time later riding a Warmblood type or visa versa?
|
|
|
Post by rideanotherday on Oct 6, 2016 16:47:21 GMT
Here's my question. Which is better? I don't mean better movement because they are just different. My question is which movement makes a better baseline? Of course, I am going to say the handy quick horse because that's my reference point, but I will justify it by asking which is easier to go from to the other? Objectively, do you think that a rider who started riding on a handy horse has an easier time later riding a Warmblood type or visa versa?
Which is better is entirely dependent upon what you want to do. I "grew up" on an arab. Now I find I enjoy quarterhorses for most of what I want to do. I prefer utility. I want to be able to get to work...and I want to relax down the trail. Quarterhorses offer that. I do not enjoy horses that feel like they are dragging along and that was my experience on the few warmbloods I have been around. Admittedly, that is a very small sampling. I will stick to my stockhorse types because they tend to excel at the things I enjoy doing.
|
|
|
Post by horseguy on Oct 6, 2016 21:05:46 GMT
What about this question?
" Objectively, do you think that a rider who started riding on a handy horse (like and Arab) has an easier time later riding a Warmblood type or visa versa?"
|
|
|
Post by horseguy on Oct 7, 2016 18:43:16 GMT
This place on the web is defined as "A forum for thoughtful, considered and meaningful discussion". People come here and read every day. Yesterday it had 186 page views. Analytics showed that 45 visitors came and the usual members.
I'm busy. The bakery is growing, we moved to a new barn and that's requiring time & energy, and after a year in York PA I am seeing that living in this city is not easy. Point being, on days like this I feel like my time could be better spent than satisfying a bunch of lurkers.
I am considering making this forum members only, or closing it. Jimmy and Rose are regulars and help move it along, and I am grateful. Today I am thinking that this question of how the trends in horses have change how riders learn to ride and establish their expectations is important. Either no one gives a damn or they come here for a mindless break from dull office work or something even less interesting.
I care about horsemanship. I don't intend my caring to become someone's diversion from whatever. Just so you lurkers know.
|
|
|
Post by rideanotherday on Oct 8, 2016 10:30:58 GMT
What about this question? " Objectively, do you think that a rider who started riding on a handy horse (like and Arab) has an easier time later riding a Warmblood type or visa versa?" I do think its easier to go from a handy type to anything else. Though to be fair, some of the warmbloods have some pretty athletic moves. They typically have heavier bodies, which makes it it a bit difficult to be super quick and sharp in their moves. I still prefer the utility. My sister had this "amish warmblood". He was a percheron and standardbred cross and was the best of both. Certainly, he was never quick, but he was incredibly powerful. Tons of heart and a fun ride, even if he wouldn't win any races or make it on the polo field.
|
|