|
Post by rideanotherday on May 24, 2017 10:59:44 GMT
When I learned the basics of dressage / balanced seat, the focus was on the body mechanics of getting a horse to work in frame and collected. The concept of Rollkur (literally "to bite chest") was something I learned much later. I'm not sure that horses working "deep" like that can see adequately in front of themselves. Now, it seems that Rollkur isn't good enough, riders (some at the elite level of their sport) are putting the noseband so tight and using the bits hard enough that horses' tongues are turning blue from loss of blood flow. What is the deal with this? Am I just not at a level of horsemanship that I can understand why you would ride in this manner? Is this what it takes to be successful?
|
|
|
Post by horseguy on May 24, 2017 22:40:05 GMT
I have written about dressage and about how the discipline has broken lose from it's origins of military training. Contemporary dressage is adrift in my view, and when anything becomes detached from its origins reality becomes up for grabs. Just as Morris cut ties with the Fort Riley Seat principles and still asserts his methodology is and evolution of it, dressage maintains it is authentically still within the traditions of its origins. Both claims, for me, are ludicrous. Once separated from the reality of practical ,such as military movements, anything becomes potentially real. Rolkur, blue tongues, we love our horses, pigs can fly, whatever - reality is whatever you want it to be.
|
|